Tuesday 14 October 2014

James Murdoch/Rupert Murdoch Pay wall articles

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1jQxGe_uDYgYDkZLo9Rc8FUgC6DAGsFoWt5qF_HVYdgQ/edit
http://www.themediabriefing.com/article/times-digital-subscribers-reach-140-000-as-paywall-project-reaches-maturity


1. As a consumer of news I completely disagree with James Murdoch that the BBC should make users pay for their news as we must pay for it through our TV licence, why should we not be entitled to news that in truth isn't actually free. Also in my opinion the news should be a right for people to know as it is essential for people to be aware of current affairs whether its local or national.

However if I was to look at it from a business point of view or from James Murdoch's point of view I completely understand his opposition to the BBC providing news for free. Whilst the BBC provides free content the newspaper industry and other institutions will continue to decline and lose money as people will refuse to pay for their content, as they can simply get it from the BBC for free.



2. I think that Rupert Murdoch was right to put the Times behind a pay wall as to survive he must be able to generate revenue and the only way to do this is through a pay wall subscription. His move can be seen as fairly successful in that he has gained 140,000 subscriptions, however even this many subscribers is making the Times and Sunday Times barely any profit and it is still continuing to lose money.

No comments:

Post a Comment